A real horticultural hero

I know we all probably have a horticultural hero. Often family members are gardeners from the past.But then you hear a story that makes you think there are hero’s among us.

Those of you who have read my missives over the years will know my gardening ethos as being very pragmatic. By that I mean I dont get upset if things dont work. When trees fell on my greenhouse etc I just think… ok.. how do we solve it. When plants die (they do) I dont have tears I just think ok.. thats part of gardening.

But of course pragmatism has a limit.

Do you remember the lady (Melanie Lewis) who had one of the National Collections of aeoniums who appeared on Gardeners World and could pretty much name each one by sight. Forget her collection… she is clearly a national treasure herself.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0c48spl

Well imagine a power cut knocks out the heating to some of your greenhouses and you lose around 700 plants including some extremely rare cultivars. 😱 And then work out the cost of replacing and getting heaters to prevent any further issue like this will cost maybe £5-6,000. I think that’s where my pragmatism would have reached breaking point.

The fact that while downhearted (who wouldnt be) she isn’t defeated,a nd she is determined to rebuild shows me just the kind of spirit true gardeners have, and that makes her a bit of a hero. I think I will do a podcast with her, about her collection, about what happened, but also about future plans. I know she is crowdfunding to help with the cost of replacement.. so all power to her!

For those who may want to support there is a crowdfunding page which you can find here:- https://www.gofundme.com/f/aeonium-national-collection-holder-support

Soil.. should horticulture have a say?

There is currently an inquiry by the Environment Food & Rural Affairs select committee looking into soil. This is a good thing. As the great American broadcaster Paul Harvey once said, “Man — despite his artistic pretensions, his sophistication, and his many accomplishments — owes his existence to a six inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains”.

Now all the details as to how to respond can be found here. https://committees.parliament.uk/call-for-evidence/2996/ Whilst very much focussed on agriculture, I do think horticulture can and should have a view.

Willow mulch

So as you can see in terms of horticulture there perhaps is much that can be learned from how soil is treated. To mulching, not constantly digging and so on (no idea why I said the cosmos were going in at night when I meant next year).

Plough field with a conservation strip

So next door we have a ploughed field, which is fine. They grow crops and of course food security is important. Next to it is a conservation strip. Essentially that means its just left and not ploughed up. It looks slightly longer in summer than it does now, but not hugely different. As I understand it, that qualifies for some form of subsidy. Essentially public money for public good.

Mulched, not ploughed, pollinator friendly mass planting

Next door is my plot. Two national plant collections, preserving the UKs biodiversity one plant at a time (or at least having a go at it). They just happen to be plants that are pollinator friendly. They don’t get sprayed with pesticides; they are grown with collected rainwater and so on, all in an effort to be as sustainable as possible. If we delve even deeper we could look at research that shows cows fed with cosmos flowers in their feed can reduce the methane output (greenhouse gas) by around 26%, so some of this stuff really could be quite important.

But in terms of the soil, and doing the right thing with it, and to it, no subsidy, so no public money for public good. I would suggest the way I look after my soil is better than intensive farming, and what I am doing can be equally as important in terms of food security – as without those bees who just love all those cosmos and indeed hollyhocks the crops may not be in as good a state as they might be.

But purely in terms of soil, are there lessons from no dig, no spraying of insecticides, thinking about fertilise use etc that can be learned from gardens. I think maybe so.

Different name, same plant?

Putting aside the pics are in different light conditions I do sometime question whether seeds sold under different plant names are one and the same. Here is yet another one I have to work out.

First one is Sonata Pink Blush… apparently “the earliest flowering variety in our trials” according to one company.. which grows to 60cm… the second is Candyfloss Pink Sunrise…. apparently “one of the earliest to flower in our trials” from another…. Also grows to 60 cm…. Hmmmm 🤔

The fast and loose changing of seed names for marketing purposes really is a tricky one to keep on top of, if there is zero reference as to what the previous name was. Now these could be two different plants.. but I remain unconvinced.

IOS 16 really looks useful for taking pics of plants and flowers

I have never been into photography, but love how technology can help with gardening in terms f logging images and identifying things. The new ios 16 if you use apple products for me is amazing… it now lets you you essentially remove any background image (I suspect not aimed at gardeners but more for those who want to show some perfect life on instagram) which really focuses on the plant.

For me this is an amazing feature to helps show what cultivars look like when growing. Not that long ago this would have taken ages and need professional software. (Cosmos Apricot lemonade and Hollyhock Creme de Cassis for anyone interested).